We have
met several times since the last blog and continue to make progress. All five us were there. We divvied up sections of the final paper and
are all looking into literature to support our separate sections. Chase took the initiative to write the
beginning of it so we could all be on the same page before starting. Thanks Chase!
Speaking of thanks, a big one goes out to Mary Beth for being the point
lady with Youth Move and narrowing down questions to send to them prior to us
meeting with them next Thursday. We
narrowed down a dozen questions to just a few in hopes to hear from more
members in a short time frame. Hopefully
we can make it an environment where all members, even the quiet ones have a
voice. The possibility of breaking into
smaller groups may be beneficial. We are
excited to have greater perspective after this meeting. We hope that this continues to narrow our
focus and give us clarity in our direction.
The questions are as follows:
Is stigma a problem for you
and the other kids that you know?
If so, what does that look
like? Your feelings? Your everyday life?
Do you have any ideas about
how to reduce stigma for kids?
In
addition to this we discussed talking to parents with children with mental
illness about stigma and barriers to treatment.
We talked about the question of what they might need to better deal with
stigma themselves or with their kids. We
discussed the possibility of interviewing parents of the kids in Youth
Move. Robert was also interested in the
perception of kids that do not have mental illness and how we could ethically
get a population to interview. He and
Chase talked about the possibility of getting a group together at their
work. Anikka thought that she could do
the same. Scott said that he has been
talking to kids and their parents about this in his practicum. He suggested that if we wanted to narrow
things down further, that he talks daily with kids and their parents about
additional stigmas in the Latino community.
We then discussed how this is the case in other minority groups in the
valley.
Finally,
we appreciate the feedback from Lindsay.
The suggestion for looking into literature on interventions and stigma
education in schools was valuable. In
response to the question on ensuring sustainability, it is a big reason that we
feel good about making a connection with NAMI and Youth Move. It helps to know that if we move forward with
them, then they can use the work we are doing in the future. It isn’t just an assignment that will be done
when we are done with school.
Scott
Regarding your paper, I recommend trying to find Utah-specific information about the problem and consequences of the problem (if possible). Also, I love the questions that you came up with for your meeting with Youth Move, and I look forward to hearing how the meeting goes! It's always best to keep the questions open-ended to allow the youth to really guide the discussion. It's possible that you'll get enough information from the youth to write your "assessment" paper in spring semester. It will be your call if you'd like to get an additional perspective from your practicum agencies. Also, think more about your target population. Do you want to address the population who deals with stigma? Or do you want to target the "stigmatizers"? Keep up the good work.
ReplyDelete